Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
fourteen. Inside the light with the position explained previously mentioned, it truly is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made apparent that police is free to acquire action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-area duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the moment petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner as well as private respondents and will just take care of many of the areas of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or girl will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is more info a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case law in the particular court. Indeed, Every circuit has its have set of binding case legislation. As a result, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding inside the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
States also typically have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family legislation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by just one district court in Ny isn't binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning might help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions with the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more